Los Angeles in the Morning |
Monday, January 13, 2025
Gout Kills
Saturday, January 4, 2025
Sacred Text
Here is sample of an unfortunate incident that occurred yesterday. I started a blogpost about a week ago. It took a while because I needed to check some details so it might read with some credibility. Among other things also commanding my attention, I whittled and researched and fretted, finally decided it was okay to post. Copy and paste proceeded as per usual, at least so I thought, until my Control V yielded only a blank page at the blogsite destination. Gone! Gone, not even a whimper. It was hard to believe, but after two requests for technical help from library staff, my plight began to sink in. Gone! Gone, still gone.
It was at
that point that I began to do my usual - put the thinker in gear! Why is this document hidden in the
netherworld somewhere? Is there perhaps a reason? Is the topic perhaps ill
founded, perhaps unnecessary? I could definitely live with that. If, however, it is
merely a stupid copy and paste mistake that I had made, I’d like to know about it. I need a little more computer education anyway; I headed down that trail.
So here it
is another day later. Among the suggestions I had heard yesterday “perhaps type
it again” both from the librarians and from my son the residual expert for all
problems of this nature (He lives in Ontario but that does not keep me from
crying help from him). Typing again seemed like an impossibility – until late
last night. Why not give up on retyping, but perhaps just ‘recreate’ using the
same title and tell it with a different slant. There are actually
several books written about that.[i]
This is risky because I am a bit detail-challenged, even if concept-creative! And
my only handwritten notes were a few scratches I had made while checking some
details on Google! Here we go!
It all begins with my slight frustration with the endless variety of versions of Bible readings I hear in church services these days. In fact more often than not a ‘creative’ reader is doing away with the Book and the scriptures get read from an 8x11 sheet of paper or even a cell phone! π I know the inspired word is not conditional on the type of book we hold in hand, but is it not reading the Word? Public worship of God is best served if we read from only one version of the Bible. Does it not make sense to focus our readings on God rather than our variegated preferences?
A quick survey of Bible Gateway reveals 64 English versions without even signing in. Sign in to Gateway Plus and you get 233 Bible versions in a total of 74 languages! That is a lot of information, or should I say many different ways of saying the same thing. In this computer age we have resources to pursue whatever our language or version - or preference!
This is in sharp contrast to some recent experiences in our city's Interfaith Council (my main point). Scripture Reasoning is one of its program offerings. It has a narrow dogmatic sound to it; but it is exactly the opposite. It's a virtual or occasionally in-person get together, and one person, on a chosen topic will share the ‘Sacred Text’ from their particular faith. That is followed by questions for clarification and then reflections from anybody, either comparing to info from another tradition or spiritual reflection on the reading just shared. With help of a moderator, we do not critique it too death, just listen for the personal meaning, ofttimes leading to some quality testimonies of personal faith. I guess that is exactly what we're trying for, interfaith encounter!
Also, yes ALSO, these sacred texts are shared in unadorned original form (at least my impression)! Coming from my non liturgical church tradition with Bible readings from pieces of paper, I have heard in last several years in this modernist environment a considerable rendition of King James English, an old unadorned sound whether from the Bible or from Book of Mormon, or from Writings of the Baha’i, or the Quran.. I hear gentle witness from a Hindu participant who from their Bhargava Gita does not participate in Creation arguments or theologizing because creation is so far back that it is just ‘eternity,’ totally unnecessary to waste energy speculating about. Now that is something that both modernist and fundamentalist Christians need to take to heart, allow that into our creation accounts as well as apocalyptic speculations.
So this is the context. I wrote about this, and then I lost it, probably because I was a little too adamant with my Ctrl button on my laptop. Turns out the development of my thoughts was not that important after all. This is shorter! No need to wade through my earlier expanded version of that scratchpad! In interfaith it is possible to do a personal version of our various faiths in a large peaceable manner! We do not argue, no debate, and our kindly moderator always thanks the presenter and each participant for their particular contribution to the topic. [Know-it-all moderators would have greater difficulty!]
Wonderful.
Coming out of these sessions I am more grateful than ever for my faith, for Jesus,
indeed my Savior and to the Latter Day Saints, acknowledged as Prophet to the Muslims and absolute
example to the Buddhists (hear Dalhi Lama) and to the Hindus (hear also Mahatma
Gandhi, giving witness and inspiration to fellow people of India as well as
British colonialists). The inspiration for me in this ‘scripture reasoning’ is
that when sacred texts are shared in a relational way, then there
is little reason to debate. Positivity within this group becomes a positive contribution to our city.
Enough already. I
see little need for more modernizing of our Holy Bible. More important
is that we be in receptive posture to receive God’s Word for
our worship and for our life. Sacred texts
speak to us. No need to contort scriptures to please each and every one. Holy writ is
not about us. It is about the One who is above and beyond.
All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16). This is what I was trying to say before it all disappeared!
[i] Brenda
Miller and Suzanne Paola, Tell it Slant 3,2, https://www.overdrive.com .
Sunday, December 15, 2024
Yes But ...
My thinker and I are having some almost disagreement, or perhaps just good discernment. The thinker is digesting some new information, and I, namely me, is just being the person I am. New information gets scrutinized against everything else I believe or know. The new information? It was presented last evening at a public lecture at our city library, [i] a service provided to the public in cooperation with our university’s Chair of Christian Thought. Title of the lecture was “Church on Thin Ice,” based on a recent study of persons who no longer attend or participate in their longtime places of worship. Very clearly and even kindly the guest lecturer provided us with the results of why these people have excused themselves, ranging from new thoughts in personal faith journeys to several victimized by pastoral misconduct and then no avenue of accountability. In addition to the thin ice image, there was another; this one a bit startling, “Church on Fire.” The accompanying slide was not a hellfire pseudo picture, neither was it a global warming environmentalist type image, but surprisingly earthy, it was a large church engulfed in flames. Kind of disturbing, we were provided with statistics of similar fires in each province of Canada (research limited to the Canadian scene). Arson was the fire starter in each case.
It is the Q
and A following which now provided the nighttime thinking for me.
After the usual clarification type questions, there were several obviously from deep faith perspective. They challenged the speaker in her claim
that this was a sociological study, not theological. Said one of the responders
in a very animated tone, “this is very theological, in fact it is at the heart
of what church or faith is all about. Against all odds the church has lived on
and still is.” Nobody clapped at that particular point, but it was obvious that
this response was a winner, and likely most of the audience were in agreement. The presenter (also self identified as Christian) agreed this was a valid point. The evening ended
nonetheless like public lectures will – a hearty round of applause, lots of
exit door conversation, and then for me it was a thoughtful ride home on public
transit – time well spent.
A
presentation like this gives you pause, a
close-to-home familiar topic for everyone, well illustrated and well presented,
an excellent power point. According to this study no denomination is spared. Even
large assembly evangelical city churches are lagging in population. Mainline
churches are almost empty, colonialist loyalties no longer the go-to for
millennial or gen x or z’ers. Historical churches like Mennonite, Christian
Reformed or Lutheran; they have the modernist – fundamentalist stretch in each
and every congregation. And in my neighborhood the United Church, Anglican or Catholic
faithful are out on Sunday morning walks or yardwork or children’s hockey games. This is
present reality confirming the lecture just heard. And I realize
this is somewhat on theme with a number of my blogposts especially near end of
the pandemic (e.g. “Growing Faith Closing Churches,” Sept.28, 2021; “When a
Church Gets Trashed,” Aug 13, 2021; “Where have all the Churches Gone,” July 29,
2021).
So, with the
statistics and the societal trend telling a common story, my innermost
being continues to ponder. The subtitle of last night’s lecture adds some
additional tinder. Here is the full title. Church on Thin Ice: Lessons from the Quiet Deconstruction of Faith in
Canada. My own protest is beginning to take shape. As per the theme in all of my blogging to date, and as I also see lowering church attendance and increasing confusion in the younger generation there are also lifestyle incongruities among us older folk. I keep thinking about the speech by the woman towards end of the Q and A at last night’s lecture. Statistics
really are only statistics, and faith communities (as well as politicians π) will always provide exceptions to
studies just completed. I can think of several exceptions also. An Old Colony Mennonite Church in rural Alberta, those apparently stuck in the old ways as far as modern ‘faith
management’ is concerned, this latest Pentecost they had a baptismal membership
class of 43! Also, a Roman Catholic Church just up the hill from our home here
in Calgary, parking lot full and sanctuary packed every Sunday for Mass as well as
midweek services!
I am reminded of a young lady some 2000 plus years ago, visited by an angel who announced to her that she would have a special baby, He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and Mary’s response was that of a normal bright young teenager, ‘How can this be, since I am a virgin?’ And the angel says to her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God.’ (Luke 1:32-35) – kind of an ‘over message’ to a young lady who lived among people whose main wish was to get out from under Roman authority. God's message to her was about that ... and much more!
The Christian faith – and even other faiths – are not borne up by politics whether democracy or dictatorships, not by opportunism or statistical studies, nor even by consultants and the reports they might produce to determine the future. Rather, politicians, studies and consultants may be engaged only if accompanied by prayers (see Romans 12 and 13). Faith is a conviction of things not seen (see Hebrews 11). The carrier of this faith, as presented in the Bible, is Mary’s son Jesus the one predicted centuries before. The Messiah would not be a new hero. No, he would become the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6), not by his charm or charisma or even his winning ways, but by totally giving himself for all of us. The invitation to follow Him will continue through Epiphany, through Lent, the Passion and Resurrection and Ascension, and indeed Pentecost! The Savior will keep on keeping on even after the birth (Christmas Day) has been celebrated!
Statistics
and studies are depictions of the present life we are living, not invitations to faith,
although the information may be helpful and may be used of God to discover (rediscover?) the faith walk. The invitation to faith comes in many and variegated ways. The bad
news for today's churches on thin ice may be momentarily comforting because looking around us almost
everybody is in same boat (hmm, if the ice breaks a boat may be handy)! My inner being, however, takes greatest comfort in knowing a God who is eternal, everlasting, regardless of churches or institutions that come and go. Institutions may be deconstructed, but God,
Creator, Allah, will not be!
Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever you had formed the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God (Psalm 90:2).
[i] Angela Reitsma Bick at Calgary Public Library, University of Calgary Chair of Christian Thought Iwaasa Lecture on Urban Theology: “Church on Thin Ice: Lessons from the Quiet Deconstruction of Faith in Canada,” December 11, 2024.
Saturday, November 30, 2024
Utilitarianism
u·til·i·tar·i·an /yo͞oΛtilΙΛterΔΙn/ adjective
designed to be useful or practical rather than attractive. "a utilitarian building." - Oxford
This morning I had an interesting
conversation with a fellow customer at our local McDonalds. We have known each
other’s names for a year or two, but this time it was that moment of further
discovery – both of us retired, what’s the hurry. No surprise in the discovery
either; he openly enthused at recent U.S. election results, and me not so
enthused. Not much in common there, so what might a retired preacher and a
retired RCMP officer have in common? Well, on the religion topic, his wife is
Mormon and I am Mennonite, he not into religious things. I have Mormon friends
right here in the neighborhood, and he grew up near Elmira, Ontario (horse and
buggies?). Some clarifications were needed – fun conversation. Then some common
ground (kind of); I have a considerable chapter of long-haul trucking and he
used to own a limousine service before all the oil executives left town (Rachel
Notley’s fault). Oh, and one of my front teeth got fixed since last time we
said hello, so we agreed my smile is better now! This is beginning of a
friendship. Who says friends need to agree on everything?
Utilitarian is a word that has come to mind
in the last while, especially after conversations like this one. In this case
the conversation was with an almost stranger but emerging friend. Conversations
with people I have known for years and years; they are almost the same! As
described in a previous blog (“Of Religion and Polemics,” October 31) many of
us these days are in habit of eating out, and those occasions with a sort of
unspoken protocol – things we can talk about and things we avoid. This is
almost on same basis as my new friend. We find a way to speak with or around
one another. Yes, we truly need one another, but this can also become an
exercise of diplomacy - utilitarianism?
As per the epigraph definition above, utilitarian has quite a positive ring, at least for a simpleton like me. I like practical
and useful things, rather than fancy or unnecessary impressionism. This
down-to-earth image, however, gets blurred the minute we read into further
variants, like utilitarianism. Utilitarianism gets complicated, reaching far
and wide into all kinds of new images. It even reminds me of Unitarians, those
in our inter-faith communities who will remind us that they don’t believe
anything with too much dogma. π Reading on in Google, also
I get reminded of some boring university sociology classes I once sat in. I
even remember a certain John Stuart Mill, a standard bearer in the social
sciences, who argued in favor of Utilitarianism
as an ethical approach that advocates the greatest good for the greatest number. Actions that lead to people’s happiness are right
and those that lead to suffering are wrong. https://iep.utm.edu/mill-eth/
That was in 1861. This
theory has had longtime credibility and also critique among philosophers,
theologians and scientists. Happiness. Is it not more than our actions? Yes, so
say I and so say many more (check your Google). It is indeed a longtime topic ongoing
even as the world has repeatedly dipped into some opposite practices, like two
world wars! Reality does not necessarily prove theories wrong (obviously
because I needed to study Mill in university 112 years later). The interplay of
reality and theory creates many university classes and ever more political
debates! [i] Crux
of the matter here? I believe that individual pursuit of happiness is not the
best approach.
Not the best approach
because it can also lead to hedonism. Hedonism focuses on the pursuit of
pleasure and avoidance of pain for the individual – not concerned about others
like utilitarianism wanting the best for the greatest number of people.
Hedonism is solely about seeking pleasure and avoiding suffering, a little
further down the slippery slope from utilitarianism. Very common these days, many sins would be in category of seeking pleasure. James 1:15 sort of … “after desire has conceived, it gives birth
to sin, and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death.”
Personal happiness is an
elusive thing. As illustrated in a previous blog, even when sitting in social
‘gatherings’ we actually pursue our own
happiness quite vigorously. One of my faith brothers may advocate a point of
view which I am diametrically opposed to, but hold back because I do not wish
to make a scene, or I don’t like to make him feel badly, or other unhappy
reasons. Personal happiness in this case may lead to fearfulness, even while
the brother and I both adhere to similar sentiments as stated in our Bible,
e.g.1 John 4:18, “perfect love drives out fear.” Knowing
this, we probably should look at another scripture, Therefore each of you must put off falsehood
and speak truthfully to your neighbor, for we are all members of one body (Ephesians 4:25). Happiness especially
among persons of similar faith commitment must include genuine encounter with
one another.
There is irony here of
course. In the ten minute conversation with my new friend there was no
fearfulness, even though our differences popped up immediately. We do not agree
politically, I am a Christian believer in Jesus and also one of those weird
Mennonites who don’t believe in warfare, he is a militarist not a church goer,
and his wife is a Mormon, one of those cultish Christians who we agree are
excellent neighbors in this our community. And both of us having lived in Calgary
for about 35 years after moving from Edmonton, still have sentimental Oilers
Stanley Cup memories!
This is probably why the
sociologists and others still have not yet solved the world’s problems! This
happiness topic along with faith/unfaith implications, and this among long time
and also brand new friends. While meditating on this I happen upon a striking
digital headline (where else do we get news these days). I consider this not
coincidental, but providential. I read about an influential man I have known
about for years.
Tony
Campolo, an American Baptist minister and sociologist who spent decades trying
to convince evangelicals and other Christians that their faith should motivate
them to address social ills like poverty and racism, has died. November 19,
2024. He was 89. [ii]
Tony
Campolo, have heard him speak and a forever influencer in my years of ministry.
Two further quotes in that same clip: Ryan Burge, former pastor and
professor of Political Science, said, “He was able to speak to
audiences from all corners of American Christianity — reminding them of the
radical grace and forgiveness that is found in th Gospel”; and this
one, “Campolo was a popular professor of sociology ... who made the
study of social trends come to life for his students. But after moving to … an
evangelical Christian college, he discovered that his contemporary evangelical
world needed the gospel message as much as the wider world did. Evangelicals’
privatized religion had led them to abandon the social gospel that Jesus
taught.”
This
professor had a humbling message for all of us Christians, in fact for all
people of faith and unfaith. Rest in peace brother. True happiness is to count
yourself among all; it is to know yourself to be blessed. Above and beyond
utilitarianism, even! I cannot but conclude with a few words from Jesus’ Sermon on
the Mount, provided for us in two versions.[iii]
‘Blessed are the meek, for they
will inherit the earth.
‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for
they will be filled.
‘Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.
‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
‘Blessed are the peacemakers, for
they will be called children of God. (Matt
5:5-9 NRSV)
“Happy are people who are humble,
because they will inherit the earth.
“Happy are people who are hungry
and thirsty for righteousness, because they will be fed until they are full.
“Happy are people who show mercy,
because they will receive mercy.
“Happy are people who have pure
hearts, because they will see God.
“Happy are people who make peace,
because they will be called God’s children. (Matthew 5:5-9 CEB)
[i] Well
illustrated in United States just prior to latest presidential election.
[ii] Religious
News Service, http://religionnews.com/
[iii] A further must see is Matthew 5:5-9 in
Eugene H Peterson, The Message (NavPress, 1993, 2002, 2018).
Friday, November 15, 2024
Making Churches
Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body.
(Ecclesiastes 12:12)
This is the time of year
when my thinker really gets going, and probably also the season of my life to think about what to do with all that thinking. My wife’s opinion, knowing me
for many years, is that the thinker cannot be denied, but do not yield to too
much musing. Musing can be destructive, especially when you have what the
medical practitioners call Seasonally Affected Disorder. So, when I sit with my
laptop and some books and some notes or out on long walks, apparently that is
better than if I just lay on the couch.
After the latest predictable
results of the U.S. presidential election there is of course much to read and hear
and, yes, think about. After reading the next morning’s New York Times headlines
(no need to subscribe, I just click the poor-man’s overview), I then also
clicked to Sojourners, my lifelong Christian social justice
magazine which I have subscribed to since I was a college boy – quite a while.
Two quick readings, both of similar opinion but presented very
differently. Adam Russell Taylor, [i] current
president of Sojourners,
gives some advice for a day like
this. “There is a lot of work ahead,” he says, “and I’ve felt tempted to just
pour myself into all that will be required of us in months to come…. I
challenge you to rest before you reset. This is the time to lean first and
foremost into our faith and not our politics." Rest. A good idea it was,
because the thinker was already tempted into verbosity. In my case, verbosity
can be a risk, a liability even.
This morning’s sermon in our
church [ii] was on similar premise as Russell Taylor and the NYT, namely that Donald Trump is not good news for America. The sermon provided good advice from the Bible’s
epistles; eager to do good (1 Peter 3:13) and also the famous one from
Ephesians 6 about the full armor of God, so that “you may
be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to
stand…” (:13). So here we go. The title of this post, as well
as my previous post, as well as today’s sermon, does not really suggest
restfulness. Considerable diligence here; if not lots of work to do,
then at least lots to think about.
Without claiming any super
insight at this point, I find myself thinking a slightly different line. What
if the premises, the assumptions are wrong? What if Donald Trump, in spite of
his misogyny, his unbearable egocentric Make America Great Again (MAGA)
platform, may be the right President for the next four years? Is it right to
write editorials and present sermons with the assumption that he should not
have won? I totally enjoyed the opener of today's sermon recounting conversation
with an elderly kind philanthropic long-time supporter of our worldwide relief
service agency being of the opinion that Donald Trump is God’s choice (she
cringed and we laughed). It was an excellent attention getter and clearly
communicated her respect for this elder in our midst and also the importance to communicate
peaceably especially in days like this. It also raises this my further question.
In this last year an
interesting podcast series has emerged among all the inboxes, notifications and
posts in our digital world. This one is quite gentle and very respectfully
presented. It becomes interesting in its somewhat unique format, story-form history providing a new look at some old stuff. [iii] Well researched, it is about the makings of the Anabaptist Mennonites.
Being a person of this background, I still have good memories of my
post-secondary education throbbing with exciting sixteenth century
‘discoveries.’ That was my people back there, those not wishing to be
encumbered by big Church taxes and tithes and ‘indulgences’ to help get out of
the catholic middle state of purgatory and joyfully jump into heaven. This is
our movement with the noble beginning and which I wrote enthusiastic essays
about. This latter podcast series is now becoming an old-age ‘fresher upper’
for me.
Anabaptist history can use a
little reality check. We too were among other diligent students of Martin
Luther, of Ulrich Zwingli and other clerics and church leaders along with a thirsting
population; all this after invention of the printing press and people beginning
to read for themselves. Much has been and continues to be written about the
Reformation chapter of history.
This podcast tells about a twist in those early beginnings. “Free Radicals is a historical story-telling highlighting events from the radical fringes of church history, redeeming them from the unforgiving lens of orthodoxy.” In the first post (Season 1, Episode 0 – available here https://www.freeradicalspod.com/2023/12/29/episode-zero-released/ ) William Loewen provides a delineation of the word ‘radical’ definitely there at beginning, but not the first impression one gets in today’s Anabaptist or Mennonite culture. Although a cool discovery in my college years back in the early 1970’s (hippy years), now seeing this series hosted by a young man the age of my youngest daughter is not only humbling but educational. Those of us inclined to think that our honorable way of following Jesus was and still is the right way, still kind of radical, and yes way back there we even suffered for it at the hands of our fellow believers, the Lutherans. [see my previous blog!] π
Fact is, our history got
perverted also by us, enemy forces within (Luke 6:45) even
while apparently trying to correct forces without. That early history included
misappropriated ambition, egocentric preachers, misinterpretation of
scriptures, twisted eschatology, and sin. Maybe after we have done our Anabaptism at 500 celebrations in 2025
and then four years of Donald Trump, us longsuffering peacemaking
half-evangelical, half progressive Anabaptists will render an apology to the
Lutherans and the Catholics! [Interesting tidbit from our latest historian:
Loewen advises that in 2018 a service of apology by unofficial representatives
of Catholic, Lutheran and Anabaptist believers actually did take place at the
St. Lambert’s Church in Munster, the very place of the unsolicitous uprising.] [iv]
So this post shall conclude
here. It would be premature and irresponsible of me to wade into further
opinionating of how us Christians – or other faith communities – need to
participate, or perhaps not participate, in the pratter and the social media so
prevalent after election results in the U.S. (and before the imminent election
in Canada). Elections so far by democratic process (almost?) and democracy still means leaders chosen by the people, all eligible
persons of whatever faith or unfaith (if you didn’t watch too many U.S. media scrums before this last election). Our Anabaptist history and the
history before that, is not about democracy; it was/is extreme faith practice
in whatever political circumstance. Today’s situation: is it nothing new? Or is
it very new? Or is it nearing the Parousia, the return of the One
who gave his life for all? [v] I
am old enough to say I’m ready for the end. Then no need to make more churches,
or denominations, or seminaries to explain the Greek variants of Parousia, or
political dictatorships with new old-fashioned rules.
Even as my thinker goes on,
I take comfort in the epigraph above. No need to study it all too hard! And I
am willing to follow the thinking of this present generation – not blindly, but
with humble gratitude to those who review our formative journey. Thy will be
done, Oh Lord!
___________________
[i] Adam Russell Taylor is president of Sojourners and
author of A More Perfect Union: A New Vision for Building the Beloved
Community. https://sojo.net>sojoaction.
[ii] Donita Wiebe-Neufeld (2024) "Thoughts of War and Peace and What to Do" (Unpublished sermon at Trinity Mennonite Church, Calgary, AB: November 10, 2024).
[iii] Loewen, W.J. (Host), 2023/12/29 – [Audio Podcast] Free Radicals.
[iv] Lloyd Hoover, “Group seeks forgiveness
for trauma of Munster,” Anabaptist World, June 11, 2018.
[v] Parousia, Greek root meaning presence, with variants
Divine Presence, Second Coming preceded by signs, https://www.biblestudytools.com/dict.
Thursday, October 31, 2024
Of Religion and Polemics
po·lem·ic /pΙΛlemik/ noun plural noun: polemics
a speech or piece of writing expressing a strongly critical attack on or controversial opinion about someone or something. [i]
Even
as the price of groceries is upward bound along with everything else (except
wages), it seems that social encounters are still happening, at least for those
who are healthy enough mentally or sufficiently extroverted to make the effort.
High prices notwithstanding, these social occasions continue around food and
drink. To me this is both a comforting thought and also a bit of concern.
Comfort comes easily along with the term “comfort food.” Familiar food well
prepared is reason enough to rejoice to high heaven for the great privilege of
having enough tasty morsels to continue our habits – such luxury. For example,
at latest Thanksgiving the mealtime guests and the turkey were almost
coterminous.
Concern
is more related to the places of our eating. Eating together, still a
sentimental idea, may show up kind of noncommittally, like conversations that
end with, “You’ll need to come over for dinner one of these days” or “drop by
for coffee or a beer” or one of those equivalents. I can think of a couple open
enders like that which are stretched out way too long. “We say it and then we
don’t do it,” my wife lamented the other day. Exactly. Even while “we wish it
weren’t so,” neighborhood insulation or isolation continues. We don’t come over
to each other’s places.
There
are variations on this, of course. In our case we are part of the church. Here
the blanket wish statement about ‘get-together-sometime’ is almost being
replaced with a new discovery. We have become an after-church lunch crowd in
nearby restaurants! It is kind of in-groupish and informal, so the usual
participants are easily gathered by whispered signals in the foyer
(occasionally a guest invited); then we each get into our cars and join a
little cavalcade. Presto, in 15 or 20 minutes we are assembled (reassembled) at
the chosen eating place. Now we are in the larger crowd, neighborhood Sunday
lunch! These after-church lunches follow a protocol: Everybody pays their own,
usually men and women somewhat separated just to facilitate ease of
conversation. Topics to avoid: the sermon we just listened to; the ongoing war
in Gaza; the election going on in the U.S. (Canadian scene not necessary at the
moment because we already know who are the Liberals, the NDP, or Conservatives
in our circle). Topics okay: dental or medical appointment issues of the past
week, sunshine holiday trips reviewed or being planned, and what the kids are
up to, plus some CFL or NHL reports or World Series right now, final word
usually provided by person with the loudest voice! π That’s about $25 per person, tip
included. We do like to keep up with one another and we also like to support our
local economy! We do this because we can! Part and parcel of a societal trend,
still not coming to each other’s places, but at least getting together.
I
used to be pastor of a church with no building. This is 40 plus years ago, a
new congregation in formation stage. Our worship life happened in a rented
facility, and everything else in other places wherever two or three
gather in my name (Matt.18:20). I would cheerfully frequently
reference that scripture. Small groups for fellowship or study, committee meetings,
and even occasional large group gatherings (eg Christmas Eve) all happened in
our homes! In this lively environment, I would preach openly against Sunday
restauranteering, saying it is no-fair to seat ourselves in those
establishments on a Sunday, expecting chefs and waitresses to look after us. My
reason? They too need a day of rest just like we had just enjoyed in our
worship services. Now I smile to myself knowing that the people of today
would smirk and wonder at the presumption of that young (or by now old)
know-it-all. The good people of those years? They agreed. [Old bygone days, I
know. Sigh!]
Of
Religion and Polemics. The gaudy title of this post might suggest it will be a
doctoral dissertation or something like that. Definitely not; it is merely the
ponderings of my thinker again. The big title and the restaurant meals are two
sides of the same coin! Seems to me (that’s as close I’ll come to saying “It is
my thesis …”) that our yearning for fellowship and the avoidance of genuine
encounters are but today’s version of a thirst that has been forever. Among the
proclamations and idealisms of young preachers and the testy opinions of middle
agers, or the experienced perspective of senior citizens, I am increasingly
convinced that faith communities – whether they be churches, synagogues,
mosques, gurudwaras, or people’s living rooms - are all in pursuit
of company, including Divine company. Religions, of whatever label, also in
that pursuit.
Just
yesterday I picked up a small freebie pamphlet entitled The Bible and the Protestant
Reformation [ii] giving a brief and concise
description of how Martin Luther, chosen by God, had been instrumental in
availing the Bible for all to read, and thus to find the way to salvation
through Jesus Christ, not the Roman Catholic Church. It is a Protestant statement
about the Reformation. Within my faith commitment there are elements of precise
agreement with this Trinitarian apologetic, but also something in this document
that I must label as polemics. Things have changed in the 500 or so years after
the16th century. [iii]
A news article in Christian Century, August 12, 2008 is entitled
“Lutherans to apologize for Anabaptist Persecution: Decision of Lutheran World
Federation Council.” Yes, the initiators of Protestantism have extended an
official apology to the Anabaptists for their participation in the killing of
those who took Luther’s teachings seriously enough to celebrate the rite of
adult Believers baptism, thereby removing themselves from membership in either
Catholic or Protestant Church. This heartfelt apology is an example of
honorable review; ongoing relationship with fellow pilgrims in the Christian
faith and also people of other traditions. The Lutheran pastor, one of my
friends in this corner of Calgary, is in full agreement with that new view of
their Reformation history. Reading and relating to my neighborhood in this
way is indeed a great satisfaction in my continuing faith journey.
Some
time ago I read a book by an author named after my two sons (not at all true,
but the author’s name is David Bentley Hart). [iv] π
Even
if I was a little over-enthused by his name, I found this book quite
informative, an overview of Christianity including the Early Church, the
Gnostics, the Crusades’ encounter with Islam, Oriental and Western Church,
Middle Ages, Reformation, to name but a few headings. [v] The Edicts, the reassigning of
allegiances, persecution and warfare is a testimony of endless polemic. That
historical rhetoric is ongoing and gravely illustrated especially now as I type
these words just a few days before the U.S. Presidential election. Discussion
topics in our fellowship circles aside; we must pray fervently for our American
brothers and sisters. "Thy will be done on earth as it is in
heaven" (Matthew 6:10).
It
is because of these observations and learnings that I find myself occasionally
weary of routine habits like coffee klatches and rhetorical polemics, whether
political, religio-political, or within our various and sometimes competing
denominations of Christianity. There is much to learn, and much to repent of.
This must therefore end with the same vision as my last blog.
Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,”
for the first heaven and the first earth had
passed away” (Revelation 21:1).
[i] Google. Oxford
Languages.
[ii] A. Stoutjesdyk,
Trinitarian Bible Society (London, England: William Tyndale House, 2017).
[iii] See Rev. Ruedi Reich, Inauguration of the Memorial Plaque to the “Anabaptist Martyrs of Zurich,” Gareth Brandt, Radical Roots (Morgantown, PA: Masthof Press, 2024), p 26.
[iv] David Bentley
Hart, The Story of Christianity: A History of 2000 years of the
Christian Faith (New York: Quercus, 2009).
[v] Ibid., Two chapter headings illustrate Hart’s interesting style, “The 19th Century: A Time of Radical Doubt” p.306 and “The 19th Century: A Time of Fervent Faith” p.314.
Monday, October 21, 2024
Seasons Come Seasons Go
Inspirations, thoughts, phrases, and/or titles to things often come in surprising or weird ways. This morning I was walking my usual sidewalk. My brain seemed preoccupied with two things. One was the seasonal repeat of autumn leaves crunching underfoot, coming from above and blown about here, there and everywhere (almost recognizing last year’s patterns of which trees had shed their leaves in which places). The other was preoccupation with today’s Canuckle word which still had me baffled in the morning darkness. So I walked, waving a few neighbors off to work and a couple walking their dogs. On my mind was the no-brainer of autumn leaves and the brain-baffling word of the day!
When
I got back in the house and into the kitchen, rubbing my hands trying for a
quick warmup, I pulled my cellphone out of jacket pocket and gave it one more
try in front of the coffeemaker. There it was: AGAIN! Fifth try, finally I got
it! Such a simple ordinary five-lettered word inspired by that Canadian television
show of the sixties, “On the Road Again.” Why hadn’t I thought of that earlier?
One of the vowels is repeated - and it showcases unique stories and
traditions of people living in this good country. So, vowels repeated and
different episodes every day. AGAIN, what a nice Fun Fact word and theme for
this day.
Seasonal
occasions can be either repetitive mumble jumble or quite exciting. I’m glad each day presents a different word! If today's Canuckle word was same as October 18, 2023 I would have quit playing by now and probably the game would be dead! Repeat
patterns must have something new or they die! I think of certain habits my
wife and I nurture, now in retirement quite important to us. Every morning just
before breakfast after I have had my morning walk (yes the morning walk a
perfect remedy for my Type-2, and mental mindset for the day). [That plus prescriptions of course, pills – aagh]. Anyway, back to
topic at hand, the morning ritual also includes lighting two candles, and then we read the devotional as
outlined in a publication from our church denomination. I read the scriptures,
she reads the devotional, and then one or the other of us leads the prayer. Oh,
and that is ritually interrupted by a 5 minute timer to stir the porridge! The
ritual is the routine, not necessarily the set time – one of the benefits of
retirement scheduling! The scripture passages and the discussion and the morning moods are new each and every day. If within the ritual
we were to read the same passage each day and repeat same prayer, it might be
well dead by now.
I
think also of other ‘almost’ rituals. I have been looking forward to beginning
of the NHL Hockey Season. The only given is the schedule – and it is date/time
specific all the way through until next April 17. So on time and on schedule
the season has opened. This year already small variation at least for Edmonton
Oilers fans. Opening night was already devoid of cheers because they lost the opener to Winnipeg Jets (6-0) and next game turnovers galore to
last year’s lowest ranking Chicago Blackhawks (lost 5-2). Roster changes like
first round draft pick Connor Bedard and the ho hum aging of star players like
Connor McDavid do make a difference. [Note wins are also on record by now (2W 2L),
including last night’s win against Nashville 4-2]. So the hockey season
2024-25, although set in time, is already different than last year. The ongoing
life is in the wins – losses, the injuries and even the personal circumstances
faced by players and coaches alike. On similar theme, the World Series are
coming up. Repeat repeat, I remember listening to the series on radio during my
high-school days. This year’s headline news, the Los Angeles Dodgers and New
York Yankees will square off! It’s been 43 years since that last happened! The
Series still rolling along year after year, but would have been dead long time
ago if there were not winners and losers, competitors (and fans!) in American and National League action during each
and every season.
The
coming and going of seasons and the life therein. In a recent sermon in church our pastor began
with a reference that he labeled as bad news. Churches are dwindling; statisticians claiming that as per present rates of births, deaths, and church attendees, by 2040 the church may be extinct! “Ouch,” he says with that
attention getter, and then moves on to tell us this most certainly is not our
reason for being. We are not gathered to prop up a dead institution. The real
reason for our gathering is to celebrate that we have the Messiah, as declared
by Jesus’ eager student Peter in Matthew 16: 16 Simon Peter answered, “You
are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Are you here because of loyalty to a dead
institution, or to experience the power and the presence of
the One who is beyond times and seasons?" That
was the timely question. Aah, I thought to myself, that's a good shaker-upper
for us.
Does
this suggest we ignore times and seasons? No, we cannot ignore them, but it
means we stop fussing and fretting about rise and fall of institutions, and also some institutionalized habits like camping season and winter holiday season and those other good life rhythms. The original meaning of
times and seasons is not so much about our lifestyle seasons as about seasons of the year and also seasons of our life. Interestingly, my lifelong nescheah [i] in these last several
retirement years has been providing some extra info on that as well. Our
indigenous forebears cannot be forgotten any longer. I discover this via recent
books read [ii] and also new friends. Rev
Tony Snow, a United Church Minister and member of Calgary Interfaith Council,
will remind us of seasonal encounter with the living Messiah. This
Messiah is available to each of us as trees and gardens go to sleep and wake up, as birds migrate and bears hibernate and emerge. The medicine wheel and ceremony is an expression of our dependence on Creator God ever present and available within the rhythm of seasons. Hai! Hai! All us Jewish and Muslim and Christian colonialists have so much to learn from Indigenous brothers and sisters. Seasons are a part of encounter with our living Creator God, and availed for
our lives through none other than Jesus our Messiah. Here is reason for us to reach
out to neighbors (all creatures great and small) with harmonious intent rather than preoccupation with individual rights and freedoms and political and religious polemics.
Again and again. Each time around there are new things to learn, until that day which will probably be beyond times and seasons.
Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,”
for the first heaven and the first earth had
passed away (Revelation 21:1).
[i]
Low German for “nosey curious boy.”
[ii]
See references by an Episcopalian Bishop, Dr. Steven Charleston, The Four
Vision Quests of Jesus (New York: Morehouse Publishing, 2015) and also
Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass (Minneapolis: Milkweed
Editions, 2013).