Saturday, January 4, 2025

Sacred Text

Here is sample of an unfortunate incident that occurred yesterday. I started a blogpost about a week ago. It took a while because I needed to check some details so it might read with some credibility. Among other things also commanding my attention, I whittled and researched and fretted, finally decided it was okay to post. Copy and paste proceeded as per usual, at least so I thought, until my Control V yielded only a blank page at the blogsite destination. Gone! Gone, not even a whimper. It was hard to believe, but after two requests for technical help from library staff, my plight began to sink in. Gone! Gone, still gone.

It was at that point that I began to do my usual. Why is this document hidden in the netherworld somewhere? Is there perhaps a reason? Is the topic perhaps ill founded, perhaps unnecessary? I could definitely live with that, but if it is merely a stupid copy and paste mistake that I had made, I’d like to know about it. I need to grow in computer skills anyway; it would be interesting to head down that trail.

So here it is another day later. Among the suggestions I had heard yesterday “perhaps type it again” both from the librarians and from my son the residual expert for all problems of this nature (He lives in Ontario but that does not keep me from crying help from him). Typing again seemed like an impossibility – until late last night. Why not give up on retyping, but perhaps just ‘recreate’ using the same title and tell it with a different slant. There are actually several books written about that.[i] This is risky because I am a bit detail-challenged, even if concept-creative! And my only handwritten notes were a few scratches I had made while checking some details on Google! Here we go! 


"

It all begins with my slight frustration with the endless variety of versions of Bible readings I hear in church services these days. In fact more often than not a ‘creative’ reader is doing away with the Book and the scriptures get read from an 8x11 sheet of paper or even a cell phone! 😒 What is happening to the concept of inspired Word? I’m getting tired of this; does not meet my criteria for worship of God nor respect for the assembled people! We seem to be pleasing ourselves more so than looking to the Word.

A quick survey of Bible Gateway reveals 64 English versions without even signing in. Sign in to Gateway Plus and you get 233 Bible versions in a total of 74 languages! That is a lot of information, or should I say many different ways of saying the same thing. In this computer age we have resources to pursue whatever our language or version - or preference!

This is in sharp contrast to some recent experiences in our city's Interfaith Council (my main point). Scripture Reasoning is one of its program offerings. It's a virtual or occasionally in-person opportunity for one person, on a chosen topic, to share the ‘Sacred Text’ from their particular faith, that followed by questions for clarification and then reflections from anybody, either comparing to info from another tradition or spiritual reflection on the reading just shared. With help of a moderator, this has lead to some quality testimonies of personal faith - I guess we can call that exactly what we're trying for, interfaith encounter! Also, yes ALSO, these sacred texts are shared in unadorned original form (at least my impression)! Coming from my non liturgical church tradition with Bible readings from pieces of paper, I hear in this modernist environment a considerable rendition of King James English, an old sound whether from the Bible or from Book of Mormon, or from Writings of the Baha’i, or the Quran.. I hear gentle witness from a Hindu participant who from their Bhargava Gita does not participate in Creation arguments or theologizing because creation is so far back that it is just ‘eternity,’ totally unnecessary to waste energy speculating about. Now that is something that both modernist and fundamentalist Christians need to take to heart, allow that into our creation accounts as well as apocalyptic speculations.

So this is the context. I wrote about this, and then I lost it, probably because I was a little too adamant with my Ctrl button on my laptop. Turns out the development of my thoughts was not that important after all. This is shorter! No need to wade through my earlier expanded version of that scratchpad! In interfaith it is possible to do a personal version of our various faiths in a large peaceable manner! We do not argue, no debate, and our kindly moderator always thanks the presenter and each participant for their particular contribution to the topic. [Know-it-all moderators would have greater difficulty!]

Wonderful. Coming out of these sessions I am more grateful than ever for my faith, for Jesus, indeed my Savior and acknowledged as Prophet (to the Muslims) and absolute example to the Buddhists (hear Dalhi Lama) and of course the Hindu maverick Mahatma Ghandi, giving witness and inspiration to fellow people of India as well as British colonialists. The inspiration for me in this ‘scripture reasoning’ is that when sacred texts are shared in a relational way, then there is no reason to debate. Positivity within this group becomes a positive contribution to our city.

Enough already. I see little need for more modernizing of our Holy Bible. More important is that we be in receptive posture to receive God’s Word for our worship and for our life. Sacred texts speak to us. No need to contort scriptures to please each and every one. Holy writ is not about us. It is about the One who is above and beyond.

All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16). This is what I was trying to say before it all disappeared!


[i] Brenda Miller and Suzanne Paola, Tell it Slant 3,2,     https://www.overdrive.com .

No comments:

Post a Comment